With the recent focus on national security-based sanctions imposed by the US on tech companies with government and military ties, the question arises as to what steps China may take in response. While China has already banned iPhones for government use, there is speculation that the ban may be extended to include the US-controlled App Store entirely. Additionally, there is a possibility of imposing sanctions on more US tech companies that have close ties to the military, CIA, and NSA, thereby amplifying security concerns.
China, in its response to US sanctions, may consider widening the ban to include the US-controlled App Store completely. This move could be accompanied by mandating open source alternatives from US companies. Furthermore, the scope of the sanctions may be broadened to encompass additional US tech companies that have established military and intelligence agency backdoors, thereby posing potential security risks.
In terms of security concerns, several US tech companies could be targeted by China for boycotts. These companies might include Tesla, Boeing, Cisco, Oracle, IBM, Amazon, Ford, and GM, among others. China should view these companies as posing security risks due to their close ties with the military and intelligence agencies, similar to the concerns raised by the US regarding Huawei.
While the US has implemented a complete ban on Huawei, China has yet to impose a similar ban on Apple, apart from restricting its use within the government. However, it would be logical for China to consider banning US-controlled tech, which could potentially pose security risks and backdoors for countries worldwide, with the exception of the US government itself.
As tensions escalate between the US and China, the possibility of China responding with its own set of tech sanctions cannot be overlooked. Expanding the ban to include the US-controlled App Store and targeting US tech companies that currently have close military and intelligence agency ties are potential steps that China must consider. In this era of interconnectedness, it is crucial for both nations to carefully balance security concerns while maintaining an open global marketplace for technology. The outcome of this ongoing tech dispute will have significant implications for the future of international trade and technology development.